archersangel: (bite me)
[personal profile] archersangel in [community profile] stargate_schadenfreude
as seen on many a LJ & DW journal; the article is here



Perhaps a more seedy, and disappointing aspect of the hits to Universe’s popularity, though, is the fanbase itself. “I don’t think if we for any reason go away, it is an issue necessarily of the quality of the product that we’ve been making,” said executive producer and co-creator Brad Wright. “I think getting moved on the schedule has hurt us. And the fact that some of the fans that liked SG-1 and Atlantis were so angry that they have deliberately hurt us, which is unfortunate.”

Indeed, log on to any message board, and the vociferous level of criticism directed towards Universe for its supposed role in the demise of Stargate Atlantis is obvious, as is the recent, unpleasant schadenfreude in its ratings descent. Websites have even been set up purely for opposition to the show, which seems like a curious move for people who are supposedly avowed fans of the franchise. Simplistic descriptors such as Stargate In Name Only abound, and the feeling of engendered ill wishes can be nauseating.

on 2010-11-08 12:13 am (UTC)
juliet316: (Star Trek TOS: The needs of the many)
Posted by [personal profile] juliet316
It is but it's a DS9 Holodeck recreation from Jake and Nog's perspective. (I don't know if it's apart of DS9's Virtual Book Season or not). It's supposed to be good, but after being burned by the finalie I'm not touching any Enterprise novel that says "Holodeck recreation" in it.

Profile

stargate_schadenfreude: "SGU: also known as SG: WTF" (Default)
Let's Mock Stargate Universe!

Page Summary

May 2011

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Page generated May. 28th, 2025 06:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios