catsmeow (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
catsmeow) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
stargate_schadenfreude2009-11-09 08:41 pm
catsmeow) wrote in stargate_schadenfreude2009-11-09 08:41 pm
Clarissa, er, I mean -- Joe Explains It All!
Here are some indications of the deep insightful attitude that producer Joe Mallozzi has on the issue of body swapping taken from the November 7th entry of his blog:
IJH writes: “What about what Young and his wife did to Telford? They used his body for sex without his consent.”
Answer: You assume it was without his consent. Although nothing was said either way, it seems most unlikely that someone who was giving up their body for a conjugal visit wouldn’t consider this to be a possibility.
So, silence means we can assume consent. Good to know! Oh, and don't worry about any other consequences, since Brad Wright points out:
Gatelady writes: “Having sex while using someone else’s body is wrong. What about STD’s? What about pregnancy?”
Answer: As Brad once said “They know what causes that now.” And there are precautions that can be taken to prevent both.
There. See? No problem!
Oh, and per the October 31st entry
if you were offended by that broom closet scene in Air I, I guarantee you’ll be clawing your eyes out of your skull given what we have in store later this season. Also, while I can understand why some may have had a problem with that broom-closet scene in the premiere given that it did come as a surprise to many, I can’t muster up much empathy or understanding for those complaining about the Scott-Chloe scene in Light. Again, if it’s a matter of not enjoying shows that focus on the occasional romance between characters, then that’s unfortunate – because that’s the type of show you’re watching. If, on the other hand, it’s an innate response to the very notion of intimacy no matter how modest the scene, then I’d suggest a deep-rooted personal issue that would be best dealt with somewhere other than this blog.
So, either you like what they give you or you need you psychological help. So very glad they cleared that up!
IJH writes: “What about what Young and his wife did to Telford? They used his body for sex without his consent.”
Answer: You assume it was without his consent. Although nothing was said either way, it seems most unlikely that someone who was giving up their body for a conjugal visit wouldn’t consider this to be a possibility.
So, silence means we can assume consent. Good to know! Oh, and don't worry about any other consequences, since Brad Wright points out:
Gatelady writes: “Having sex while using someone else’s body is wrong. What about STD’s? What about pregnancy?”
Answer: As Brad once said “They know what causes that now.” And there are precautions that can be taken to prevent both.
There. See? No problem!
Oh, and per the October 31st entry
if you were offended by that broom closet scene in Air I, I guarantee you’ll be clawing your eyes out of your skull given what we have in store later this season. Also, while I can understand why some may have had a problem with that broom-closet scene in the premiere given that it did come as a surprise to many, I can’t muster up much empathy or understanding for those complaining about the Scott-Chloe scene in Light. Again, if it’s a matter of not enjoying shows that focus on the occasional romance between characters, then that’s unfortunate – because that’s the type of show you’re watching. If, on the other hand, it’s an innate response to the very notion of intimacy no matter how modest the scene, then I’d suggest a deep-rooted personal issue that would be best dealt with somewhere other than this blog.
So, either you like what they give you or you need you psychological help. So very glad they cleared that up!
no subject
Real people would not consent to this. And if some magical super waiver covers it all they should have had it onscreen since their magical stones play such a huge part in the story.
no subject