Ivorygates (
ivorygates) wrote in
stargate_schadenfreude2010-05-17 06:52 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Here Now The News
I don't know which is more annoying: this whiny bitchboy's pious rant against "SGU Sucks", or the SGU Sucks site, if it's doing what he says it is.
http://www.airlockalpha.com/node/7446
http://www.airlockalpha.com/node/7446
no subject
Sherry has (apparently) been a regular commenter on Joe M's blog and is highly critical of any negative comments about SGU. She's also very active in the same manner on Twitter. There also seems to be a connection between her and Gateworld's recent crackdown on any negative comments about SGU in the forums.
As she explains in detail, she went to Gateworld and was displeased to see "a group of people voicing their "opinion" about why Stargate Universe is not what they want." She contacted the owners of Gateworld "were unable to explain to me why they continued to allow this "minority" to continue to ruin what these two individuals have worked hard to build". Right about then came the the new rule.
Oh, and did you know that folks who don't like SGU are suffering from a false sense of entitlement, are the same as welfare cheats working the system. They are also incapable of success and "they could never act, write, produce or even sweep the floors for SGU. ".
So, if SGUsucks is poking at Sherry, I can understand why they are, even if I think it would be best to ignore her.
no subject
Can I just say that between her and the folks at Alpha Site, I want to go curl up at the other end of the internet? Because really, Alpha Site, I like being anonymous. It helps to keep my sanity intact, damn it. It's not actually cowardly.
no subject
no subject
Also, what was he smoking when he created it?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, right. It could happen. DIAF, lady.
no subject
Because there is no reason for anyone to ever use a pseudonym on the internet. Ever. There is no possibility that using one's real name could compromise a poster's personal safety.